Secondary content using h2 tag. Column 2
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Forest Health NotesA Series for the Non-Industrial Private Forest Landowner |
||||||||||||
back to Forest Health Notes Table of Contents
|
||||||||||||
Laminated Root Rot, Yellow Ring Rot Hosts: Most conifers Quick ID:
Tree & Stand: Affected trees show marked reduction in height and diameter growth. The crown thins and yellows, and may frequently produce a distress crop of cones. Trees are commonly windthrown after the disease rots off roots just below the root collar, forming a "root ball." Early in the decay process, crescent-shaped or semicircular reddish brown staining of the wood may be observed. As decay progresses, the wood softens. The earlywood disintegrates more quickly than the latewood in each annual ring, resulting in a laminated ring rot where the annual rings of the wood separate. Small oval pits appear on both sides of the separated wood sheets. This disease forms root rot centers, where the disease has spread out over time from an initial infection. In the center will be either an old stump or an empty area, or in an old center, regeneration. Trees within several yards to hundreds of feet (depending on the size and age of the infection) will be dead or dying, and trees further out will show early crown symptoms. Trees within 50 feet of the apparent edge of a disease center are very probably infected as well, but will not show crown symptoms until half to 75% of the roots are infected. Root rot centers may be many acres in size, and spread out at the rate of about 1-2 feet per year. Fungus: Fruiting bodies (conks) are uncommon, but when found are located in protected areas such as on upturned roots and on the underside of decayed logs. Conks are flattened and range in color from buff to dark brown, with a white margin. The exposed surface is covered with many small pores. Reddish brown to brown whiskery mycelia (fungal fibers) may be observed between sheets of decayed wood, and white to purple-grey mycelial sheaths may be observed on outer bark surface of roots. May be confused with: Armillaria root rot, Annosus root and butt rot, or animal damage. Disease
cycle: Laminated root rot is considered to be the most damaging
root disease in the Pacific Northwest, as it kills the greatest
concentrations of trees in the areas where it is present. There
appears to be two distinct forms, one that causes a root disease
in Douglas-fir, grand fir, and hemlock, and another form that causes
a butt rot of western redcedar. The western redcedar form has only
been identified on the east side of the Cascades, although western
redcedar on the west side occasionally becomes infected with the
Douglas-fir form, to which it is tolerant. The disease is spread
by root contact between a healthy and infected individual. Mycelia
of the fungus Predisposing agents: Although all conifer species can be infected by laminated root rot, susceptibility varies. Old infected stumps from previously infected stands are a serious problem for regeneration of highly susceptible species. Certain silvicultural procedures such as commercial thinning or uneven-aged management may make infestations worse. The disease often occurs with other root diseases such as Armillaria root rot or Annosus root and butt rot. Laminated root rot is itself a predisposing agent for bark beetle attack. Impact: On the west side of Oregon and Washington, laminated root rot causes annual losses of 32 million cubic feet of wood; east side damages could be equally high. The incidence of the disease has probably increased substantially with the suppression of fire and subsequent species shift to Douglas-fir/grand fir forests, as these species are highly susceptible to laminated root rot; ponderosa pine and western larch are more tolerant. Management: Laminated root rot often occurs with other root diseases and predisposes
trees to bark beetle attack. Always check apparent bark beetle kills
for root disease signs as their presence may influence species regeneration
and silvicultural methods. Control of laminated root rot is best
attempted at the time of final harvest. Prior to harvest, the disease
centers should be marked by examining outlying trees for characteristics
of the disease (e.g. mycelia on the roots, reddish stain in the
heartwood). Infected trees should be marked low on the bole so the
mark remains after harvest. It is suggested that disease centers
should be mapped as well as marked to enable them to be tracked
over time. Global Positioning Systems (GPS) may make mapping centers
and tracking them over time easier, and that technology is rapidly
becoming affordable. All trees in the disease center, as well as
uninfected trees within 50 feet, should be cut. During the harvest,
stumps should be examined outside the marked disease center for
the characteristic red-brown semicircular staining; the disease
center boundaries and buffer strips should be adjusted accordingly.
It is important to check within a day or two of harvest as the stain
fades quickly upon exposure to air. In Washington, the easiest,
most cost-effective control is replacement of Douglas-fir/grand
fir stands with other, less susceptible species. One 50-year rotation
of tolerant, resistant or immune species such as ponderosa pine,
western white pine, lodgepole pine, or western redcedar should result
in the disease dying out on the site, provided that susceptible
trees are not permitted to be reestablished. Another good alternative
is a hardwood species such as alder, which is immune to the disease.
A rotation of an intermediately susceptible species such as western
larch may permit laminated root rot to remain on the site, though
at a lower level than with highly susceptible species. Interplanting
highly or intermediately susceptible trees with tolerant or rsistant
trees will not help them survive; on the contrary, it is more probable
that the tolerant trees will become infected. Susceptible species
should not be planted within 100 feet of a disease In 10 to 15-year-old sapling stands with less than 25% of the area infected, thinning the diseased trees could be an effective measure. In young stands affected trees will appear scattered rather than in clear disease centers. All trees displaying symptoms, as well as all those adjacent to them (within two normal tree spacings, both high and intermediate in susceptibility), should be cut. This should break the disease pathway to healthy trees by killing the roots on which the disease spreads. It is important to cut the adjacent trees that do not show symptoms as the disease may be in an early stage and thus undetectable, or the tree may become infected later as its roots grow towards the disease center. When precommercially thinning near disease centers, always try to save tolerant or less susceptible species. Silvicultural treatments such as weed control or fertilization to maximize growth will neither help nor hinder the spread of the disease. Heavily infected sapling stands may be grown to harvestable small poles before losses become severe. Where pole stands have numerous disease centers and more than 20% of the area is visibly affected, do not commercially thin; harvest at a younger rotation age. In pole stands which do not have numerous centers, or in which the centers are widely distributed, infected trees and nonsymptomatic adjacent trees should be harvested in a commercial thinning. The stand should be monitored for windthrown trees, which should be removed yearly to prevent their infestation by bark beetles. Adapted from Hadfield, J.S. and D.W. Johnson, Laminated Root Rot. USDA Forest Service -Pacific Northwest Region, 1977, and from Hadfield, J.S. et al., Root Diseases in Oregon and Washington Conifers, USDA Forest Service-Pacific Northwest Region, 1986. back to Forest Health Notes Table of Contents |
|
|||||||||||
| About Forest Health Notes
Forest Health Notes were prepared by Donna Dekker-Robertson, Peter Griessmann, Dave Baumgartner, and Don Hanley, Washington State University Extension. The assistance of Robert L. Edmonds and Robert I. Gara, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, is gratefully acknowledged. Insect or disease treatments should always be part of an overall forest management planning process. It's a good idea to have a forest management plan for your property. This tool will help you prevent problems and keep your forest healthy. For information on forest stewardship educational programs, contact your local WSU Extension office. For information on technical assistance and financial incentive programs, contact the Washington Department of Natural Resources. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will assist landowners in developing conservation plans. |
||||||||||||
Heading using the h3tag
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Field
Identification