Secondary content using h2 tag. Column 2
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Forest Health NotesA Series for the Non-Industrial Private Forest Landowner |
||||||||||||
back to Forest Health Notes Table of Contents
|
||||||||||||
Animal and Mechanical Damage Hosts: all trees Quick ID:
Field Identification Animal damage: Scarring of trunk with antlers, teeth or claws, caused by deer, elk, bears, pocket gophers, mice and porcupines. Forage on roots from pocket gophers. Pocket gopher burrows nearby. On seedlings and saplings, clipped tops and branches from deer or snowshoe hare browsing. Holes in trunk caused by woodpeckers or sapsuckers. Sudden browning of foliage, particularly in spring after winter feeding. Mechanical damage: Windthrown and broken trees lying in approximately the same direction indicates damage from severe windstorm. "Cat face" scars from equipment use resemble animal feeding but are generally larger and lack teeth marks; the wood may be gouged. May be confused with: Damage from insects or disease. Occurrence: Bears damage trees by removing the bark for feeding or to leave
a territorial marker. Feeding damage is extensive in the spring
before other food sources are available, and bears seem to prefer
fast-growing trees of all species. Porcupines eat the inner tree
bark, often climbing the tree to reach the thinner, smoother bark.
They may partially or completely girdle the tree. Pocket gophers
and mice gnaw the lower stem and the roots; pocket gophers can completely
remove all the roots of a young seedling. Deer and elk browse the
tips and branches of young seedlings and saplings, seeming to prefer
Douglas-fir. Snowshoe hares and rabbits clip off Mechanical damage occurs as a result of weather events and human activities. Major storms with severe winds can cause windthrow. Lightning strikes appear as a long, narrow gouge down the side of the trunk. Logging equipment may cause serious injury from bulldozers etc. scraping against trunks and removing portions of bark. Felling trees can cause injury as the falling tree removes branches from residual trees. Impact: Bark feeding by bears causes hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of damage. Pocket gophers can be a serious problem for regenerating conifer stands. At a density of more than six burrows per acre, 75%-85% of the seedlings may be killed by root foraging. The problem is particularly acute in ponderosa pine stands, as gophers prefer pine roots to other types of forage. Mechanical damage from windstorm can cause huge losses over a wide area, although quickly organized salvage operations could save much of it. Tree injury from logging operations can be serious as wounds are subject to many heart and butt rots. Management: Control measures for animal damage vary. Bears, elk and deer are protected during much of the year; hunting them in season will keep the numbers manageable. If you have a recurring problem with these species, permitting others to hunt on your land will reduce the total number. The Department of Wildlife will help control especially troublesome deer and elk. Some authorities advocate bear feeding stations in the early spring. Porcupines, rabbits and mice rarely kill trees: however, they are not protected and as such you may control them as you see fit. Pocket gophers may be trapped or poisoned. Traps placed in main runways are fairly effective, poison-laced grain may also be placed in runways. Mechanical damage due to abiotic events such as lightning is difficult at best to control. Windthrow can be prevented in part by not opening up shallow-rooted stands, especially stands with root rot. Wounding damage from logging operations may also be reduced by:
Adapted from G. M. Filip et al, Strategies for reduction of decay in the interior Douglas-fir and Grand fir types, in: Silvicultural management strategies for pests of the interior Douglas-fir and Grand fir forest types, proceedings of a symposium held February 14-16, 1984. back to Forest Health Notes Table of Contents |
||||||||||||
About Forest Health Notes Forest Health Notes were prepared by Donna Dekker-Robertson, Peter Griessmann, Dave Baumgartner, and Don Hanley, Washington State University Extension. The assistance of Robert L. Edmonds and Robert I. Gara, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, is gratefully acknowledged. Insect or disease treatments should always be part of an overall forest management planning process. It's a good idea to have a forest management plan for your property. This tool will help you prevent problems and keep your forest healthy. For information on forest stewardship educational programs, contact your local WSU Extension office. For information on technical assistance and financial incentive programs, contact the Washington Department of Natural Resources. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will assist landowners in developing conservation plans. |
||||||||||||
Heading using the h3tag
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.